Get Adobe Flash player

Canadian Politics

Garth Turner: Canada’s First Green Party MP

garthturner-hill-reduced1.jpgVeteran — and now former Conservative — MP Garth Turner is about to join the Green Party. Oh, I know he’s not quite there yet, but after a couple town hall meetings this weekend, his constituents will surely nudge him into the welcoming Green fold. It may be awkward for some Conservative Milton/Burlington residents to bless Garth’s entry into the Greens, but given Harper’s poll numbers, it is hard to imagine they will demand he continue to support the party that has just ousted him. After all, Turner has never been particularly shy about speaking his mind and he is adamant that his constituents come first before partisan overseers. Presumably, that is why they keep electing him. So, when Garth crosses the floor, he will be (mostly) powered by green principles — not by high octane political maneuvering. In other words, Garth Turner is no David Emerson.

If you have a gander at Turner’s recent MPtv segments, — his thoughts about the environment and his recent interview with Green Party Leader, Elizabeth May — it becomes clear that a natural organic chemistry is forming between Turner and the Greens. And, while he is (I think) primarily motivated by principles (and he can well afford them), he is also well aware that choosing the Greens will give him a high-profile platform that will attract significant media attention. After all, should he choose to accept Elizabeth’s mission, Turner will make history by becoming Canada’s first Green Party MP. Equally important, such a move will guarantee a spot for May in the next federal election Leader’s debate.

So, how long will it take Garth to make up his mind? In this week’s MPtv interview with May, Turner asks (and almost teases) “how are you going to get somebody down here (to the floor of the House of Commons). How long is it going to take?”

You tell us Garth!  I’ll be expecting an announcement on Monday, October 23 at 10am, sharp.

Israel vs Lebanon: Were war crimes committed?

UNIFIL MapWith an apparent lull in Afghanistan reportage, Canadian media have again stuck out their tongues to taste the fetid winds emanating from the Liberal leadership race. That air was particularly thick yesterday after Liberal front-runner, Michael Ignatieff told a Radio-Canada interviewer that Israel committed a war crime in Qana after they massacred 28 Lebanese civilians last July. I’m not a big fan of Ignatieff, but I was both surprised and impressed to hear him make such an unequivocal statement. Harper’s response was more predictable, however. Putting on his best paternal, Judeo-Christian, sour game face, our sociopath Prime Minister droned: “This is consistent with the anti-Israeli position that has been taken by virtually all of the candidates for the Liberal leadership.” And predictably, every one of Ignatieff’s leadership rivals has since walked a well-worn Liberal tightrope by distancing themselves from Ignatieff’s “anti-Israel” stance, while lashing out at Harper’s “classically thoughtless” remarks.

And so the winds blow. And so another issue dissipates into the upper strata of the atmosphere — well out of range of public discourse. So the question remains? Did Israel commit war crimes in Lebanon? And did Hezbollah commit war crimes in Israel?

Yes and yes, according to Amnesty International. On August 23rd, the group reported:

“Israel’s assertion that the attacks on the infrastructure were lawful is manifestly wrong. Many of the violations identified in our report are war crimes, including indiscriminate and disproportionate attacks. The evidence strongly suggests that the extensive destruction of power and water plants, as well as the transport infrastructure vital for food and other humanitarian relief, was deliberate and an integral part of a military strategy,” said Kate Gilmore, Executive Deputy Secretary General of Amnesty International.

The report includes evidence of the following:

  • Massive destruction by Israeli forces of whole civilian neighbourhoods and villages;
  • Attacks on bridges in areas of no apparent strategic importance;
  • Attacks on water pumping stations, water treatment plants and supermarkets despite the prohibition against targeting objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population;
  • Statements by Israeli military officials indicating that the destruction of civilian infrastructure was indeed a goal of Israel’s military campaign designed to press the Lebanese government and the civilian population to turn against Hizbullah.

Add to this the widespread ecological damage caused by this war, including a massive oil spill that threatens much of Lebanon’s coastline and wildlife. Of course, AI also rightly takes umbrage at Hezbollah’s rocket attacks against Israeli civilians. But this was an all out asymmetrical war, in which Israel threw everything it had into it — thousands of troops, billions of American dollars, bunker busters and cluster bombs, all sanctioned by the questionable moral support of Bush, Blair, Harper and the rest. It was a monstrous — and criminal — confrontation between stupidity and madness.

It’s a pity the Liberals can’t offer substantive debate on this issue.

New Prescription from the Spin Doctor

I just stumbled upon a talented Doctor of Spin. All I can say is this doctor really knows how to articulate my rage! Well done, Doctor!

In a Green Canada, every month is May

Elizabeth MayYesterday the Green Party of Canada elected Elizabeth May as their new party leader. Given the fatigue that many Canadians feel for the old left-right, liberal-conservative binaries, let’s hope that May will bring something new to Ottawa politics. It would be about time.

After all, here in southern Ontario, there is very little healthy green space left. Conservatives and Liberals alike have encouraged endless growth and watered down laws designed to encourage sustainable land use. With a surging GTA population now living in L.A.-style sprawl, air quality is terrible and we no longer have the capacity to adequately deal with the region’s sewage or the chemical soup we call “storm water”. And let’s not talk about the even bigger issues of global warming and fossil fuel depletion (Harper is certainly trying not to). Liberal and Conservative governments continue to run this country like a pyramid scheme: keep bringing in new bodies to devour resources in order to expand the infrastructure to bring in more bodies to devour resources… The Ontario Liberal “Places to Grow” plan calls for an additional 4.4 million people to move to this region over the next 25 years. Most of this growth is expected to come from immigration and is presented as a fait accompli — although groups such as Immigration Watch Canada are calling for dramatic reductions in immigration intake.

use_of_pond_prohibited.jpgIt will be interesting to see how May and the Greens tackle the problem of immigrant-driven growth, given that the current population of Canada may be approaching the carrying capacity of the country. Certainly population will have a major impact on Canada’s ability to meet what ever kind of greenhouse gas emission policy the Harper regime manages to come up with. May has announced she will run in Cape Breton during the next election. She should have more than a fighting chance, given her credentials and the good work she did to get the Feds to relocate residents affected by the Sydney tar ponds. Let’s hope so. Ottawa can use all the political biodiversity it can get.

Let’s cut and run… there I said it

Another Canadian dead in Afghanistan from a suicide bomber. Let’s just get the hell out of there. If NATO has to be there, let them put a ring around the goddam place. Don’t let any weapons in. Don’t any let heroin out. Whatever. Trying to impose democracy at the point of a gun either does not work or is just not worth it. There I said it — maybe with more rage than reason. But I said it.