Get Adobe Flash player

Development

In a Green Canada, every month is May

Elizabeth MayYesterday the Green Party of Canada elected Elizabeth May as their new party leader. Given the fatigue that many Canadians feel for the old left-right, liberal-conservative binaries, let’s hope that May will bring something new to Ottawa politics. It would be about time.

After all, here in southern Ontario, there is very little healthy green space left. Conservatives and Liberals alike have encouraged endless growth and watered down laws designed to encourage sustainable land use. With a surging GTA population now living in L.A.-style sprawl, air quality is terrible and we no longer have the capacity to adequately deal with the region’s sewage or the chemical soup we call “storm water”. And let’s not talk about the even bigger issues of global warming and fossil fuel depletion (Harper is certainly trying not to). Liberal and Conservative governments continue to run this country like a pyramid scheme: keep bringing in new bodies to devour resources in order to expand the infrastructure to bring in more bodies to devour resources… The Ontario Liberal “Places to Grow” plan calls for an additional 4.4 million people to move to this region over the next 25 years. Most of this growth is expected to come from immigration and is presented as a fait accompli — although groups such as Immigration Watch Canada are calling for dramatic reductions in immigration intake.

use_of_pond_prohibited.jpgIt will be interesting to see how May and the Greens tackle the problem of immigrant-driven growth, given that the current population of Canada may be approaching the carrying capacity of the country. Certainly population will have a major impact on Canada’s ability to meet what ever kind of greenhouse gas emission policy the Harper regime manages to come up with. May has announced she will run in Cape Breton during the next election. She should have more than a fighting chance, given her credentials and the good work she did to get the Feds to relocate residents affected by the Sydney tar ponds. Let’s hope so. Ottawa can use all the political biodiversity it can get.

Life in the fast bike lane

PennyFarthingA week ago or so I was bemoaning the loss of a bike lane – an 18-inch strip of pavement that made commuting by bike feel a little safer. Well, it seems I’ve been asleep at the switch. In truth, I’m not allowed anywhere near the switch, but I must have been sleeping ’cause I missed the fact that a number of GTA regions are currently conducting “Pedestrian and Cycling Master Plan” studies. As part of this process, the Town of Markham has added 100 Km of urban bike/pedestrian trails over the past year and has plans to connect most schools, libraries and community centres. More power to them. This contrasts with the City of Toronto’s grand plan to add 1000 Km of new bike lanes and trails. With a budget of over 2.5 million dollars, the city managed to add one — yes “1″ — kilometre of new bike path over the past year. Perhaps Toronto City officials are spending too much on the three “C”s: Conferences, Computers and Catering?

In spite of my previous gripes, things may soon get better for cyclists north of Toronto. York Region, is apparently coming to the conclusion that it is not healthy to cede absolute control of the landscape to roads and automobiles. Development in this region has proceeded so quickly that there are areas where walking (never mind cycling) is all but impossible. The Region has now taken a baby step to fix this problem by unveiling its own Pedestrian and Cycling Master Plan Study. This was introduced to the public at the end of May, but it is still early days, so it is possible to get involved. If you happen to live here or have cycled the Region’s glacier-made, rolling countryside, then you can provide direct feedback through an online survey.

Sam WhittinghamIt’s too easy to be cynical about efforts such as these — especially when you live in a region where the developer has reigned supreme for so many decades. But an expanded network of bike lanes and bike/pedestrian paths is just too important for this region to allow for cynicism. In any case, there are a few reasons to remain optimistic. Cyclists are known to be unusually stubborn and persistent and they rarely give up. Consider the number of Canadians and Americans who cycle coast to coast each year. Or consider the recent attempt to break the world cycling speed record in Casa Grande, Arizona. The recumbent bicycle is the preferred human-powered vehicle for these races in which top spinners sustain average speeds of over 80 Km/hour. The world record-holder, Sam Whittingham, is Canadian from British Columbia and the proprietor of Naked Bicycles, “a custom bicycle and accessory fabrication company based on Quadra Island, B.C.” Are you lobbying for an expanded network of bike lanes, Sam?

A Reaction to Ontario’s Places to Grow Plan

If you think about it, information technology — particularly word processing and PowerPoint — has had a tremendous effect on the way governments communicate with their citizens. Yesterday we saw a provincial plan for nuclear development and just a day later, the Ontario government released a brand new "Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe". The 54-page document, entitled Places to Grow: Better choices. Brighter future outlines the Province's intentions for the north shore of Lake Ontario. As I read it, much of this document appears to be a cut and paste job, a collection of abstract, touchy feely ideas and political talking points — a vision statement, if you will. The crux of the matter is that over the next 25 years, the area's population is expected — if not encouraged — to grow by close to 4 million people. To accommodate this growth, the plan calls for a series of connected areas of high-density housing and commercial activity. It will also attempt to protect Ontario farmland by using a system of economic rewards and penalties to favour urban intensification instead of sprawl. The grand plan also provides practical information for local governments such as the following advice on the kinds of infrastructure that will be needed:

"Investment in community infrastructure — such as hospitals, long-term care facilities, schools, and affordable housing — should be planned to keep pace with changing needs and to promote more complete communities."

The report's generous use of italics is ironically appropriate, because presumably it will be up to the community to pay for all of this infrastructure. Conveniently, the Places to Grow document makes no mention of the police, fire-fighting and ambulance services that will be required to meet the needs of 4-million additional bodies. It also makes no mention of daycare, mental healthcare and other costly social services. It should also be noted that the word "taxes" is no where to be found in this document. No, this generic, highly abstract, flight of fancy is more concerned with logistical issues such as housing, "moving people" and "moving goods". Ok, so it's a "Vision statement", not a "Growth plan". They had to start somewhere, right? The trouble is, as a vision, Places to Grow provides no indication that growth must also be limited by what the land can bear. It needs to account for the fact that large tracts of land are needed for forests and wildlife that contribute to the overall health of the land. Whatever Places to Grow really is, we have seen similar kinds of announcements in the past. On June 5th, 1973, Premier Bill Davis "boldly" announced the Ontario government would "freeze" development to curb urban sprawl and protect 1.3 million acres of land in order to create a "green strip all around Toronto". In fact, Bill Davis’s “Green Belt” has become a grey belt of industrial complexes which surround highway 407 and the marching lines of power transmission towers which are omnipresent in the north end of Toronto. Today, the reality on the ground is that thousands of acres of agricultural land within Vaughan, Richmond Hill and Markham are being carved up for "traditional" low-density housing. Those suburaban residents will primarily be commuters — as indicated by the number of new homes with 2 and 3-car garages. To pave the way for this kind of development, York Region has begun to widen a number of outlying arteries, including a stretch of Dufferin street and Major Mackenzie Drive. Dufferin Street between 16th Avenue and Major Mackenzie Dr, Richmond Hill Up until a year ago, this stretch of Dufferin was a tree-lined two-lane road that included bicycle lanes which had been used by commuting and recreational cyclists for many years. To prepare for the sprawling subdivisions which will soon pack both sides of this road, Dufferin has now been widened and the bike lanes have disappeared. West side of Dufferin, south of Major Mackenzie Dr, Richmond Hill The topsoil has long been scraped off. Gas and water mains and a few roads have been installed in preparation for the rapid development of low-density housing that will soon fill this tract of former farmland. Formatting the future As a product of the modern information technology era, the Ontario Plan can be commended for its typography and overall graphical treatment. That's about the best one can say about it. Although it conveys some pretty feelings about preserving farmland and a handful of good ideas, such as tying the development of housing with the creation of local jobs, this plan — if it is actually followed — will acomplish too little too late. Our children are suffering from poor air quality and diminishing water quality now. Too much farmland and natural habitat are being destroyed now. This document is based on the illusion that an ever-growing population can be shoehorned into a finite patch of land — with finite resources — in a way that is sustainable.

Scraping off the topsoil

jd01.0.jpgI happen to live a few kilometres north of Toronto in a town that has grown from 12,000 to 160,000 people since I moved here in 1972. It is astounding to think how much we have been able to alter the landscape in such a short span. In the late 70′s people in these parts tried but failed to stop the opening of the Keele Valley Landfill– a facility that “grew up” to become a 28-million ton mountain of waste. Now that the site has been capped with clay, it is being turned into “passive recreational land”, replete with soccer fields and an 18-hole golf course. As thousands of new home owners pour in, I wonder if they are aware of the environmental history of the area. A huge swath of houses is slated to be built just south of the former dump site. Last winter I took a few pictures of the heavy machinery that has now scraped off millions of tons of top soil, sand and clay from what used to be fields of corn and woodlots. What took glaciers thousands of years to create has been undone in a matter of months. And some people doubt that humans could be causing global climate change?

jd03.jpgSo what are the real costs of this development? Over the past 35 years, the air quality has gotten steadily worse as the Greater Toronto Area became a snarling mess of vehicles huffing poison. We are told that rates of asthma and resperatory diseases have increased dramatically in recent decades. Last summer a single rainstorm caused unprecedented road damage and flooding because the GTA is so built up there is no where for run-off water to go. A week ago, another sinkhole opened up, swallowing a major intersection. Meanwhile, York Region continues to build the BIG PIPE, a sewage project that has involved pumping out billions of litres of ground water from the Oak Ridges Morraine aquifer. If completed, this pipe will encourage even more sprawl, accelerating the region’s ecological death spiral.

jd02.jpgIt is sad and appalling to watch politicians and developers work together to commit teracide in the name of free enterprise. Future generations (should they survive) will look back upon this age of “development” with bemusement. This meandering scribble is not a protest — I am just as guilty for watching all of this take place and have not put up much of a real fight. It is amazing how we gaze with upon ancient pyramids and tombs and wonder how the ancients could build such massive structures. It is easy to forget that every day we create our own giant pyramids of waste spread out over entire countries, scrape millions of acres bare of vegetation and soil in order to choke our own planet. Perhaps only a 50-year, time-lapse movie, shot from space could show these activities for what they appear to be: a form of cancer, or madness, or both.